Gilbert Arenas stirred the pot recently on his show, ‘Gils Arena’, by claiming that Devin Booker and Trae Young are more natural scorers than Stephen Curry. This bold statement sparked a lot of discussion among fans and analysts alike.
“Devin Booker would be considered more of a scorer than Steph. Natural scorer. Like Trae Young is considered more of a natural scorer than Curry.”
Gilbert Arenas says Devin Booker and Trae Young are considered scorers more than Steph Curry 👀
(🎥 @GilsArenaShow )
pic.twitter.com/Bc878xSgnh
— NBACentral (@TheDunkCentral) August 23, 2024
Arenas argued that while Curry is undeniably a great scorer, he is often seen more as a shooter than a pure scorer.
To understand Arenas’ perspective, it’s important to look at the scoring styles of these players. Trae Young, in his six-year career, has averaged 25.5 points per game on 43.6% shooting from the field and 35.5% from three-point range. His best scoring season was in 2019-20, where he put up 29.6 points per game, showcasing his ability to score from almost anywhere on the court.
Devin Booker, known for his mid-range game and ability to score in various ways, has averaged 24.3 points per game over his career, with a 46.4% field goal percentage and 35.7% shooting from three. His best scoring season came in 2022-23 when he averaged 27.8 points on an impressive 49.4% shooting from the field.
Stephen Curry, on the other hand, has averaged 24.8 points per game over his 15-year career, shooting 45.0% from the field and an incredible 40.8% from three-point range. Curry has led the league in scoring twice, with his best season in 2020-21, where he averaged 32.0 points on 48.2% shooting from the field and 42.1% from three.
Gilbert Arenas’ point seems to revolve around the idea that Booker and Young have always been tasked with being the primary scorers on their teams, relying heavily on their scoring abilities to lead their respective squads. In contrast, Curry, while a prolific scorer, is often seen through the lens of his exceptional shooting, particularly from beyond the arc.
However, Curry’s career stats and scoring titles suggest that he is more than just a shooter. His ability to score efficiently and at a high volume, particularly in big moments, challenges Arenas’ claim. While Booker and Young might be seen as more traditional scorers, Curry’s overall scoring impact arguably surpasses them, blending his elite shooting with a natural scoring touch.
Ultimately, Arenas’ comments highlight the different lenses through which we view scoring talent in the NBA. While Booker and Young are undoubtedly gifted scorers, Curry’s unique combination of shooting and scoring prowess makes him one of the most effective offensive players in the history of the game.
Thank you for being a valued reader of Fadeaway World. If you liked this article, please consider following us on Google News. We really appreciate your support.
