5 Shocking Reasons Why Thunder Got Destroyed By Hornets In Ugly 27-Point Loss

Nobody would have expected to see the OKC Thunder get blown out by the Charlotte Hornets in 97-124 beatdown on Monday night, and there are five shocking reasons why it happened.

6 Min Read
Jan 5, 2026; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; Oklahoma City Thunder guard Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (2) reacts after an official call following a play against the Charlotte Hornets during the second half at Paycom Center. Mandatory Credit: Alonzo Adams-Imagn Images

Nothing about this night made sense if you walked into it blind. The Oklahoma City Thunder were run off their own floor by a Charlotte Hornets team that came in with a 12-23 record and nothing resembling momentum. This was supposed to be an easy game where the starters likely get benched at some point in the fourth quarter. Instead, it turned into one of the most shocking results of the entire NBA season, with a 124-97 result in favor of the Hornets.

The Thunder still own the best record in basketball, but the shine cracked loudly here. After opening the year 24-1, they’ve now slid to 30-7, and this marked their second straight loss, except this one came with no excuses.

Charlotte led by as many as 30, shot the lights out, and never looked threatened. From the opening quarter on, the Hornets played freer, tougher, and far more connected than the league’s top team. Let’s dive into the five major reasons why the Thunder couldn’t compete on Monday night.

 

1. Charlotte Shot Oklahoma City Right Out Of The Building

This game ended the moment Charlotte realized every look was clean. The Hornets finished 41-of-77 from the field (53.2%) and an absurd 19-of-37 from three, good for 51.4%. That was a full-game shooting clinic. Brandon Miller alone buried 7 threes on 10 attempts, finishing with 28 points and a staggering +33 plus-minus.

LaMelo Ball piled on with 23 points, five assists, and five rebounds, hitting 5-of-7 from deep, while Kon Knueppel added 16 points and four more threes. Oklahoma City couldn’t chase shooters off the line, couldn’t rotate in time, and couldn’t disrupt rhythm. By halftime, Charlotte already had 10 made threes. By the fourth quarter, it felt automatic.

 

2. The Thunder’s Offense Completely Fell Apart

While Charlotte was carving them up, Oklahoma City couldn’t buy a clean look. The Thunder shot 34-of-93 overall (36.6%) and an ugly 11-of-39 from three (28.2%). That’s not just bad; that’s broken offense. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander finished with 21 points, but it took 21 shots, and he went 1-of-6 from deep.

Jalen Williams added 16 points on 6-of-14, while Chet Holmgren’s 15 points came with little impact as the deficit ballooned. The ball stopped moving, the spacing collapsed, and possessions ended with late-clock heaves. Oklahoma City recorded just 18 assists, well below their usual standard, and never found a second gear.

 

3. Charlotte Owned The Glass And Were Very Physical

This wasn’t supposed to happen against one of the league’s most disciplined teams, but Charlotte bullied Oklahoma City inside. The Hornets won the rebounding battle 52-33, including 40 defensive boards that shut off second chances entirely. Oklahoma City finished with just 20 defensive rebounds all night, a shocking number.

Moussa Diabate quietly dominated the interior with 12 rebounds (six offensive) in only 29 minutes, while Miles Bridges chipped in 11 boards of his own. Even when Oklahoma City forced misses, Charlotte was first to the ball. The Thunder looked light, reactive, and late to every loose rebound.

 

4. Defensive Identity Completely Gone

The Thunder forced 14 steals, which normally would tilt a game. It didn’t matter. Charlotte absorbed the pressure, coughed it up 21 times, and still turned those mistakes into minimal damage. Oklahoma City scored just 8 points off turnovers, while Charlotte burned OKC’s mistakes for 29 points the other way.

The Hornets consistently broke initial pressure, swung the ball, and attacked scrambled closeouts. Oklahoma City recorded five blocks, but they were isolated highlights in an otherwise leaky performance. Rotations were slow. Communication looked off. For a team that prides itself on cohesion, this was unrecognizable.

 

5. The Game Looked Over Long Before The Final Buzzer

The most alarming part wasn’t the final score, it was how early this got out of hand. Charlotte’s largest lead was 30, and the Thunder never seriously threatened after the midway point of the third quarter. Oklahoma City’s starters posted brutal plus-minus numbers: Aaron Wiggins (-26), Chet Holmgren (-25), Jalen Williams (-23), Shai (-20).

Even the bench couldn’t stabilize things. Isaiah Joe went 1-of-7, Cason Wallace managed two points in 25 minutes, and the energy never flipped. This wasn’t a bad stretch. It was a complete massacre when it comes to efficiency, especially when realizing the Hornets shot 92.0% from the stripe and scored a whopping 124 points.

Newsletter

Stay up to date with our newsletter on the latest news, trends, ranking lists, and evergreen articles

Follow on Google News

Thank you for being a valued reader of Fadeaway World. If you liked this article, please consider following us on Google News. We appreciate your support.

Share This Article
Eddie Bitar is a senior staff writer for Fadeaway World from Denver, Colorado. Since joining the team in 2017, Eddie has applied his academic background in economics and finance to enhance his sports journalism. Graduating with a Bachelor's degree from and later a Master's degree in Finance, he integrates statistical analysis into his articles. This unique approach provides readers with a deeper understanding of basketball through the lens of financial and economic concepts. Eddie's work has not only been a staple at Fadeaway World but has also been featured in prominent publications such as Sports Illustrated. His ability to break down complex data and present it in an accessible way creates an engaging and informative way to visualize both individual and team statistics. From finding the top 3 point shooters of every NBA franchise to ranking players by cost per point, Eddie is constantly finding new angles to use historical data that other NBA analysts may be overlooking.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *